HAMADEH

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Deutsch, 451 F.2d 98 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …8 U.S.C. § 201(f) (1964): “It is not necessary for the Government to show that the gift caused or prompted or in any way affected the happening of the official act.” 354 F. 2d at 197. In Howard v. United States, 345 F. 2d 126 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 838 (1965), the First Circuit said that under the anti-kickback statute, 41 U.S.C. § 51 (1964), the crime is “complete upon the acceptance of a bribe regardless of whether or not improper action is thereafter taken.” 345 F. 2d at 128. See also Krogmann…
• Driscoll v. United States, 356 F.2d 324 (1st Cir. 1966)
  …r who is engaged in receiving wagers for or on behalf of any person so liable.” . Appellants’ reference to our opinions in DeCecco v. United States, 1 Cir., 1964, 338 F. 2d 797, and Howard v. United States, 1 Cir., 1965, 345 F. 2d 126, cert. denied 382 U.S. 838, 86 S.Ct. 86, 15 L.Ed.2d 80, are not in point. In DeCeeco we reversed a trial court for talcing an issue away from the jury and in Howard we sustained a judgment based on a jury’s finding as to intent. Obviously, the juries in the oases before us ha…
• Leffler v. United States, 409 F.2d 44 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …343 F. 2d at 575. “In few areas is the admonition to give proper deference to the jury’s findings of fact more compelling than in the necessarily subjective area of intent.” Howard v. United States, 345 F. 2d 126, 129 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 838, 86 S.Ct. 86, 15 L.Ed.2d 80 (1965). In our view, the evidence here amply supported the jury’s finding. Comments of the Trial Court during the Final Argument of Counsel for Defendants. It is finally urged that the trial court committed reversible…