M & J DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE FILTER CORP. ET AL.
v.
BRIGGS ET AL.
M & J DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE FILTER CORP. ET AL.
BRIGGS ET AL.
382 U.S. 801
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Woodstream Corp. v. Herter's, Inc., 446 F.2d 1143 (8th Cir. 1971)…the defendants’ contrary contention. See Leach, supra, 404 F. 2d at 654; Williams v. V. R. Myers Pump and Supply, Inc., 371 F. 2d 192, 194 (7th Cir. 1966); Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp., 342 F. 2d 573, 576 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 801, 86 S.Ct. 11, 15 L.Ed.2d 55 (1965); Cold Metal Process Company v. Republic Steel Corp., 233 F. 2d 828, 837 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 891, 77 S.Ct. 128, 1 L.Ed.2d 86 (1956); Mott Corporation v. Sunflower Industries, Inc., 314 F. 2d 872, 877…
-
I. U. Tech. Corp. v. Research-Cottrell, Inc., 641 F.2d 298 (5th Cir. 1981)…a; Standard Coil Products Co. v. General Electric Company, 306 F. 2d 319 (2d Cir. 1962); Jones Knitting Corporation v. Morgan, 361 F. 2d 451 (3d Cir. 1966); Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp., 342 F. 2d 573 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 801, 86 S.Ct. 11, 15 L.Ed.2d 55 (1966); Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc., 356 F.Supp. 240 (N.D.Ill.1972), aff’d, 494 F. 2d 162 (7th Cir. 1974). We perceive no logical bar to the adaptation of that language to the instant suit where the p…