FERNANDEZ
v.
BABARE ET UX.
FERNANDEZ
BABARE ET UX.
382 U.S. 107
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Consumers Power Co. v. Costle, 615 F.2d 1147 (6th Cir. 1980)…operty right, since it may still maintain its pipes in the same ground. New Orleans Gaslight Co., supra, 197 U.S. at 460, 25 S.Ct. at 473; Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 374 Mich. 543, 554-55, 132 N.W. 2d 660 (1965) (dissent), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 107, 86 S.Ct. 256, 15 L.Ed.2d 191 (1965); cf. Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 387 Mich. 260, 196 N.W. 2d 144 (1972) (reimbursement dependent upon specific legislative provision). It certainly cannot be argued that the cities of Flint, Jackso…