MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO.
v.
CITY OF DETROIT

U.S. | 1965-11-15
No. 497
382 U.S. 107 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Consumers Power Co. v. Costle, 615 F.2d 1147 (6th Cir. 1980)
    …operty right, since it may still maintain its pipes in the same ground. New Orleans Gaslight Co., supra, 197 U.S. at 460, 25 S.Ct. at 473; Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 374 Mich. 543, 554-55, 132 N.W. 2d 660 (1965) (dissent), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 107, 86 S.Ct. 256, 15 L.Ed.2d 191 (1965); cf. Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 387 Mich. 260, 196 N.W. 2d 144 (1972) (reimbursement dependent upon specific legislative provision). It certainly cannot be argued that the cities of Flint, Jackso…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw