HEININGER

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION & EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Cone, 354 F.2d 119 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …s right to counsel constituted sufficient ground for reversal when an incriminating statement had been admitted. The cases that have answered this question affirmatively include People v. Dorado, 40 Cal.Rptr. 264, 394 P. 2d 952 (1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 937, 85 S.Ct. 1765, 14 L.Ed.2d 702 (1965); State v. Neely, 239 Or. 487, 395 P. 2d 557 (1964); and State v. Dufour, 206 A. 2d 82 (R.I.1965) (alternative holding). Among those decided the other way are People v. Hartgraves, 31 Ill.2d 375, 202 N.E. 2d 33 (…
• Harrison v. United States, 359 F.2d 214 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …did not request counsel. There are varying views as to whether an adult offender must request counsel in order to invoke Escobedo. Compare People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338, 42 Cal. Rptr. 169, 398 P. 2d 361 (1964), cert. denied, California v. Dorado, 381 U.S. 937, 85 S.Ct. 1765, 14 L.Ed.2d 702 (1965); United States ex rel. Russo v. State of New Jersey, 351 F. 2d 429, (3d Cir. 1965); with People v. Gunner, 15 N.Y.2d 226, 205 N.E. 2d 852, 257 N.Y.S.2d 924, (1965); Tracy v. Common [*227] wealth, 207 N.E. 2d 16…
• United States v. ONE 1965 Buick, 397 F.2d 782 (6th Cir. 1968)
  …Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. 699, 68 S.Ct. 1229, 92 L.Ed. 1663 (1948); United States v. One Ford Coupe, 272 U.S. 321, 47 S.Ct. 154, 71 L. Ed. 279 (1926); United States v. Deane Hill Country Club, Inc., 342 F. 2d 794 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 381 U.S. 937, 85 S.Ct. 1769, 14 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965); United States v. $1,058.00 in United States Currency, 323 F. 2d 211 (3rd Cir. 1963). We do not believe that the District Court should be required to determine the beneficial owners of the “bank” whose wagers c…