HERCULES CONCRETE PILE COMPANY AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PETITIONERS,
v.
ALTON J. HAWKINS AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
HERCULES CONCRETE PILE COMPANY AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PETITIONERS,
ALTON J. HAWKINS AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
189 So. 2d 612
Florida Supreme Court (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We are requested by petition for certio-rari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date August 20, 1965.
Oral argument having been heard, we have made a careful study of the record and briefs, all of which lead us to conclude that the award of the Full Commission is without error and therefore the petition for certiorari should be, and it is hereby, denied.
Attorneys’ fees are in order and respondents’ (claimants’) attorney is awarded a fee in the amount of $350.00.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
CALDWELL, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maloney v. Atlantique Condo. Complex, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…of an offer), applies in this case. The appellees claim broadly that Florida has adopted the “deposit acceptance rule,” citing Morrison v. Thoelke, 155 So. 2d 889 (Fla.2d DCA 1963), Green v. Sesac, Inc., 177 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), quashed, 189 So. 2d 612 (Fla.1966), Kendel v. Pontious, 244 So. 2d 543 (Fla.3d DCA 1971), cert. dismissed, 261 So. 2d 167 (Fla.1972), and Kendel v. Pontious, 261 So. 2d 167 (Fla.1972). In Morrison, a resident of Florida desiring to buy Florida land from the Thoelkes, who…