AIR DISPATCH, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1965-06-01
No. 1004
381 U.S. 412 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …To some extent this argument neglects that the Interstate Commerce Commission must also approve of such an expansion of service, see 49 U.S.C. § 303(b) (7a) (1964), Air Dispatch, Inc. v. United States, 237 F.Supp. 450 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff’d per curiam 381 U.S. 412, 85 S.Ct. 1576, 14 L.Ed.2d 693 (1965). While that agency’s approach has been criticized as unduly restrictive, Note, Regulation of Air Freight Pickup and Delivery, 76 Yale L.J. 405 (1966), it nevertheless has declared that it would not be bound by…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw