CONKLIN

v.

LAVALLEE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1972)
  …ule adopted by a court in the exercise of its supervisory powers which establishes a fixed time period within which cases must normally be brought. See n. 18, supra. See, e. g., United States v. Simmons, 338 F. 2d 804, 807 (CA2 1964), cert. denied, 380 U. S. 983 (1965); Note, The Right to a Speedy Trial, 20 Stan. L. Rev. 476, 478 n. 15 (1968). In his concurring opinion in Dickey, Mr. Justice Brennan identified three factors for consideration: the source of the delay, the reasons for it, and whether the del…
• United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1971)
  …9 F. 2d 735, 737 (CA1 1967); Fleming v. United States, 378 F. 2d 502, 504 (CA1 1967); United States v. Capaldo, 402 F. 2d 821, 823 (CA2 1968), cert. denied, 394 U. S. 989 (1969); United States v. Simmons, 338 F. 2d 804, 806 (CA2 1964), cert. denied, 380 U. S. 983 (1965); United States v. Holiday, 319 F. 2d 775, 776 (CA2 1963); United States v. Hammond, 360 F. 2d 688, 689 (CA2 1966); United States v. Dickerson, 347 F. 2d 783, 784 (CA2 1965); United States v. Rivera, 346 F. 2d 942, 943 (CA2 1965); United State…
• United States v. Feinberg, 383 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …287 F. 2d 304 (9 Cir. 1960), rev’d on other grounds, 368 U.S. 345, 82 S.Ct. 384, 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961). But see United States v. Dickerson, 347 F. 2d 783, 784 (2 Cir. 1965); United States v. Simmons, 338 F. 2d 804, 806 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983, 85 S.Ct. 1352 (1965). Appellant argues that we must presume that he has been prejudiced by the four year and eleven month prearrest delay between event and indictment. But the only lapse of time prior to arrest3 which will activate such a presumpt…

  ← 1 / 2 →