GIGANTE
v.
UNITED STATES; GENOVESE V. UNITED STATES; EVOLA V. UNITED STATES; LESSA V. UNITED STATES; AND SANTORA V. UNITED STATES
GIGANTE
UNITED STATES; GENOVESE V. UNITED STATES; EVOLA V. UNITED STATES; LESSA V. UNITED STATES; AND SANTORA V. UNITED STATES
380 U.S. 906
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Amalgamated Food Emps. Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc., 391 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1968)…stry, Chain Store Age, May 1966, at 17. A number of state courts have reached similar conclusions as to shopping centers. See, e. g., Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery Workers Local 31, 61 Cal. 2d 766, 394 P. 2d 921 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U. S. 906 (1965); Moreland Corp. v. Retail Store Employees Local 444, 16 Wis. 2d 499, 114 N. W. 2d 876 (1962). Compare Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Wonderland Shopping Center, Inc., 370 Mich. 547, 122 N. W. 2d 785 (1963) (affirming four-to-four a lower cou…
-
MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)…vague verbal formulations relating to predatory intent and ruinous competition. See Moore v. Mead’s Fine Bread Co., 348 U.S. 115, 118, 75 S.Ct. 148, 149, 99 L.Ed. 145 (1954); Forster Mfg. Co. v. FTC, 335 F. 2d 47, 52-53 (1st Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 906, 85 S.Ct. 887, 13 L.Ed.2d 794 (1965); Porto Rico Am. Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 30 F. 2d 234, 236 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 279 U.S. 858, 49 S.Ct. 353, 73 L.Ed. 999 (1929). Such vague definitions resulted in erratic application of the law a…
-
Wolin v. Port OF NEW York Auth., 392 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1968)…Fair, Farmer v. Moses, 232 F.Supp. 154 (S.D.N.Y.1964), or the parking lot of a shopping center, Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, etc., 61 Cal.2d 766, 40 Cal.Rptr. 233, 394 P. 2d 921 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 906, 85 S.Ct. 888, 13 L.Ed.2d 794 (1965). He emphasized, and we agree, that the placement of title to property is not dispositive for “Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion. The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence