TRANS-LUX DISTRIBUTING CORP.
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
TRANS-LUX DISTRIBUTING CORP.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
380 U.S. 259
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. Freedman v. Maryland, ante, p. 51.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Klaw, 350 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1965)…Gerstein, 378 U.S. 577, 84 S.Ct. 1909, 12 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1964) (same; same); Freedman v. State of Maryland, 380 U.S. 51, 85 S.Ct. 734, 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965) (movie license); Trans-Lux Distrib. Corp. v. Board of Regents of the University of New York, 380 U.S. 259, 85 S.Ct. 952, 13 L.Ed.2d 959 (1965) (same; “obscene”) . . Section 1461 provides in full: Every obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy or vile article, matter-, thing, device, or substance; and— Every article or thing designed, adapted, or in…