HALLER ET UX.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …In consequence, the law is such that in a criminal case it is enough if proof that a defendant is guilty be established beyond a reasonable doubt, not beyond all possible doubt.” . United States v. Haller, 2 Cir., 1964, 333 F. 2d 827, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 921, 85 S.Ct. 276, 13 L.Ed.2d 334; United States v. Van Allen, 2 Cir., 1961, 288 F. 2d 825, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 836, 82 S.Ct. 31, 7 L.Ed.2d 37; United States v. Research Foundation, Inc., S.D.N.Y., 1957, 155 F.Supp. 650, 653-654; United States v. Pat…
• United States v. Dante Angelo Grassi and Jack Louis Gail, 616 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ground for reversal only if it affected a substantial right of the defendant. Proof of separate conspiracies after an indictment charging one conspiracy is not, per se, prejudicial. Robinson v. United States, 333 F. 2d 950 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 921, 85 S.Ct. 277, 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964). Gail contends that he was prejudiced before the jury by his joinder in a single trial with numerous unrelated defendants and criminal evidence based on an imaginary grand conspiracy. We therefore consider the qu…
• United States v. Cruz, 478 F.2d 408 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …concerning the proof of plural conspiracies permeated the entirety of a jury trial for a single conspiracy. This case is controlled by the principles announced in Berger. See, e. g., Robinson v. United States, 333 F. 2d 950 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 921, 85 S.Ct. 277, 13 L.Ed.2d 335 (1964); Jolley v. United States, 232 F. 2d 83 (5th Cir. 1956). b. Joinder and Severance. In a closely related argument the appellants contend that the finding of two conspiracies and the separate character of some of t…