MASTRACCHIO

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF RHODE ISLAND FOR PROVIDENCE COUNTY

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• CAR Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. & Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 745 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …of the entire action. See Northlake, supra, 654 F. 2d at 1240 (plaintiff “was entitled to amend its complaint ‘as a matter of course’ any time prior to the dismissal of the action”); Swam v. United States, 327 F. 2d 431 (7th Cir.1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 852, 85 S.Ct. 98, 13 L.Ed.2d 55 (1964). Once the district court has dismissed the suit, two courses of action are open to the plaintiff: (1) he may appeal the judgment or (2) he may seek leave to amend under Rule 15(a) after having the judgment reopen…
• United States v. Guerrero, 517 F.2d 528 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …; Sanchez v. United States, 365 F. 2d 237 (10th Cir. 1966); Maxfield v. United States, 360 F. 2d 97 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 830, 87 S.Ct. 67, 17 L.Ed.2d 66 (1966); Brooks v. United States, 330 F. 2d 757 (10th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 852, 85 S.Ct. 100, 13 L.Ed.2d 56 (1964). Accordingly, by moving to dismiss at the termination of the Government’s case-in-chief and by renewing the motion at the end of all the evidence, Guerrero did preserve the sufficiency of the evidence question. O…
• Silk v. Hilary Sandoval, 435 F.2d 1266 (1st Cir. 1971)
  …v. Cohen, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 750, 752; McDowell v. Celebrezze, 5 Cir., 1962, 310 F. 2d 43; cf. Gila River Ranch, Inc. v. United States, 9 Cir., 1966, 368 F. 2d 354; but see Swam v. United States, 1966, 7 Cir., 1964, 327 F. 2d 431, cert. denied 379 U.S. 852, 85 S.Ct. 98, 13 L.Ed.2d 55. It has also apparently given rise to some disquietude. Hoffman v. Celebrezze, 8 Cir., 1969, 405 F. 2d 833; Schildhaus v. Moe, 2 Cir., 1964, 335 F. 2d 529. We neither understand the basis for this interpretation, nor symp…