GLASS ET AL.
v.
HANCOCK COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION ET AL.
GLASS ET AL.
HANCOCK COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION ET AL.
378 U.S. 558
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 1916 (U.S. 2018)…in a state legislature." Reynolds, 377 U.S., at 561, 84 S.Ct. 1362 ; see, e.g., Moss v. Burkhart, 220 F.Supp. 149, 156-160 (W.D.Okla.1963) (directing the county-by-county reapportionment of the Oklahoma Legislature), aff'd sub nom. Williams v. Moss, 378 U.S. 558, 84 S.Ct. 1907, 12 L.Ed.2d 1026 (1964) (per curiam ). Here, the plaintiffs' partisan gerrymandering claims turn on allegations that their votes have been diluted. That harm arises from the particular composition of the voter's own district, which…
-
Parsons v. Buckley, 379 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1965)…tion on the part of this Court. Cf. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483, 495-496, and 349 U. S. 294. I do not believe that any of the summary dispositions made in reapportionment cases following Reynolds v. Sims, see, e. g., Williams v. Moss, 378 U. S. 558, forecloses or obviates the need for such a [*365] consideration of this far-reaching question.2 The parties to a particular litigation should not be permitted by stipulation to thrust a federal court into this foreign activity. Except in the foreg…