DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
AMMEX WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1964-06-15
No. 919
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Goldberg dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.
378 U.S. 124 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 12 L. Ed. 2d 743 · 84 S. Ct. 1657 · SCDB 1963-150 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 995
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U. S. 324.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Goldberg dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter, 384 U.S. 35 (U.S. 1966)
    …e under the explicit supervision of the United States Customs Bureau, pursuant to laws enacted by Congress under the Commerce Clause for the regulation of commerce with foreign nations. Cf. Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Ammex Warehouse Co., 378 U. S. 124; Collins v. Yosemite Park Co., 304 U. S. 518. Unlike Idlewild, the present case concerns liquor destined for use, distribution, or consumption in the State of New York. In that situation, the Twenty-first Amendment demands wide latitude for regulat…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw