AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

LOCAL 1441, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSN., AFL-CIO, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. The United States & the Bendix Corp. & the Hewlett-Packard Co., 372 F.2d 969 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …178, 180 (1959). This rule has been repeatedly followed. See, e. g., Green v. United States, 172 F.Supp. 679, 145 Ct.Cl. 628 (1959); Smithers v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 640 (1960); Kempinski v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 451 (1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 981, 84 S.Ct. 1889, 12 L.Ed.2d [*975] 749. The United States has been entitled to invoke the estoppel defense, although not formally a party to the first suit, but solely because of privity. In no instance has this court discarded the traditional requir…
• Dunn v. United States Dep't OF Agric., 654 F.2d 64 (Ct. Cl. 1981)
  …lding of Testan that a statute providing for solely discretionary payments of money does not give rise to a “right to recover money damages from the United States.” * * * {Adair v. United States, Ct.Cl., 648 F. 2d 1318 at 1322 (1981)], cert. denied, 377 U.S. 981, 84 S.Ct. 1889, 12 L.Ed.2d 749. See also Kempinski v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 451, 453 (1964). Since it is clear that petitioner does not have a claim for monetary relief, we do not have jurisdiction of his appeal. IV. As previously stated, th…
• Hayes v. United States Postal Serv. & the United States, 859 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …ion box cases, E.g. Griffin, supra; Shaller v. United States, 202 Ct.Cl. 571, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1092, 94 S.Ct. 723, 38 L.Ed.2d 549 (1973); Serbin v. United States, 168 Ct.Cl. 934 (1964); Kempinski v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 451, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 981, 84 S.Ct. 1889, 12 L.Ed.2d 749 (1964); Martilla v. United States, 118 Ct.Cl. 177 (1950). The district court holding that appellant had not stated a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the district court was correct. AFFIRMED.…