UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Panhandle E. Pipe Line Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 343 F.2d 905 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …o transfer the case to a Court of Appeals possessing both jurisdiction and venue. Like the Tenth Circuit, we find nothing in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Federal Power Comm’n v. Texaco, supra, or in its memorandum opinion in such case reported at 377 U.S. 974, 84 S.Ct. 1881, 12 L.Ed.2d 745 denying Texaco’s post-trial motion for order perfecting proper venue upon remand, which passes upon the right of the Tenth Circuit to make the transfer here. The inherent and discretionary power issues are not discusse…
• Panhandle E. Pipe Line Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 359 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …d-Continent Oil Co. v. F. P. C., 364 U.S. 137, 147, 80 S.Ct. 1392, 1398 (1960), rehearing denied, 364 U.S. 856, 81 S.Ct. 32, 5 L.Ed.2d 80 (1960). See also F. P. C. v. Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 84 S.Ct. 1105, 12 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964), rehearing denied, 377 U.S. 974, 84 S.Ct. 1881, 12 L.Ed.2d 745 (1964). As stated in Section 1 of the Act, “[T]he business of transporting and selling natural gas for ultimate distribution to the public is affected with a public interest, and that Federal regulation in matters rel…
• Texaco, Inc. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 337 F.2d 253 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …led a motion in the Supreme Court asking that the case be either remanded to the Third Circuit or to the Tenth Circuit with directions to transfer the proceedings to the Third Circuit. The motion was denied. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 974, 84 S.Ct. 1881, 12 L.Ed.2d 745. Thereafter the Supreme Court remanded the case to this court “for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court.” This was followed by the motions now under consideration. In Panhandle Eastern Pip…