HANDELSVENNOOTSCHAP NORMA N. V. ET AL.

v.

KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. SUN Drug Co., Inc., 359 F.2d 408 (3d Cir. 1966)
  …s, Inc., 300 F. 2d 671 (4th Cir. 1962); N. L. R. B. v. Dallas City Packing Co., 230 F. 2d 708 (5th Cir. 1956), enforcement granted, 251 F. 2d 663 (1958); compare N. L. R. B. v. Atkinson Dredging Co., 329 F. 2d 158, 164 (4th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 965, 84 S.Ct. 1647, 12 L.Ed.2d 736 (1964). Our examination of the record makes it clear that the regional director and the Board, whose administrative determination is to be sustained unless clearly erroneous, exercised their expert judgment and effect…
• United States v. Trotter, 529 F.2d 806 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …d precisely what was done. It was formed for the purpose. The act done was in execution of the enterprise. Id. at 647, 66 S.Ct. at 1184. Accord, United States v. Boyance, 329 F. 2d 372, 375 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Feldman v. United States, 377 U.S. 965, 84 S.Ct. 1645, 12 L.Ed.2d 736 (1964). A defendant may be convicted of a substantive offense which he did not himself commit if it is clear that the offense was committed in furtherance of a conspiracy of which the defendant was a member. United St…
• United States v. Solomon Leroy Brown, 495 F.2d 593 (1st Cir. 1974)
  …jury. See, e. g., Koolish v. United States, 340 F. 2d 513, 526 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 951, 85 S.Ct. 1805, 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965); United States v. Boyance, 215 F. Supp. 390, 395 (E.D.Pa.1963), aff’d, 329 P. 2d 372 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 965, 84 S.Ct. 1645, 12 L.Ed.2d 736 (1964). In [*599] the instant case, it does not appear that defendant made any request to instruct the jury on the possibility of separate conspiracies, and consequently no such' instruction was given. But see United…