MARKS
v.
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
MARKS
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
377 U.S. 214
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 12 L. Ed. 2d 292 · 84 S. Ct. 1224 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1278 · SCDB 1963-122
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rocha v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 351 F.2d 523 (1st Cir. 1965)…us court upheld its constitutionality. It is true that this unanimity has not characterized the decisions of the last decade upholding Perez v. Brownell, 1958, 356 U.S. 44, 78 S.Ct. 568, 2 L.Ed.2d 603 (5-to-4; four opinions); Marks v. Esperdy, 1964, 377 U.S. 214, 84 S.Ct. 1224, 12 L.Ed.2d 292 (4-to-4), or holding unconstitutional, Trop v. Dulles, 1958, 356 U.S. 86, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (5-to-4; four opinions); Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 1963, 372 U.S. 144, 83 S.Ct. 554, 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (5-to-4; four…
-
Roni David Marciano v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 450 F.2d 1022 (8th Cir. 1971)…oard of Immigration appeals are clearly erroneous. The deportation order is affirmed. . The Second Circuit reversed on other grounds without discussing the point here in issue. 315 F. 2d 673. The Supreme Court affirmed by an equally divided Court, 377 U.S. 214, 84 S.Ct. 1224, 12 L.Ed.2d 292.…