WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP.

v.

ODOM

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lyon, 397 F.2d 505 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …in the discretion of the court. Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A. The admissibility of evidence cannot be questioned in this court on grounds not presented to the trial court. United States v. Burrell, 7 Cir., 324 F. 2d 115 (1963), cert, denied, 376 U.S. 937, 84 S.Ct. 791, 11 L.Ed.2d 657 (1964); United States v. Sferas, 7 Cir., 210 F. 2d 69 (1954). Appellants criticize the Government for its failure to introduce the challenged affidavit or the relevant testimony of the Federal Bureau of Investigation a…
• United States v. Rizzo, 418 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …sczyk v. United States, 393 U.S. 846, 89 S.Ct. 131, 21 L.Ed.2d 117; United States v. Indiviglio, 2 Cir., 352 F. 2d 276, 278-280, cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907, 86 S.Ct. 887, 15 L.Ed.2d 663; United States v. Burrell, 7 Cir., 324 F. 2d 115, cert. denied, 376 U.S. 937, 84 S.Ct. 791, 11 L.Ed.2d 657; cf. United States v. Costello, 2 Cir., 381 F. 2d 698, 700. This record admits of no doubt that the foundation laid for admissibility upon the motion to suppress was considered sufficient by Elia’s counsel. No specific…
• United States v. Iacovetti, 466 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …dant’s motion is necessitated by prosecutorial or judicial error.” 400 U.S. at 485, 91 S.Ct. at 557. To like effect, see Vaccaro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 360 F. 2d 606; United States v. Burrell, 6 Cir., 1963, 324 F. 2d 115, 119, cert. denied 376 U.S. 937, 84 S.Ct. 791, 11 L.Ed.2d 657. The appellants here, for the reasons already stated, moved for severances, or mistrials, or both. They not only contended that this was for their benefit but urged that it was absolutely essential. They knew that, if…