ROGERS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Corallo, 413 F.2d 1306 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …l keep quiet, we will be all right. Fried’s counsel misread the purport of United States v. Crimmins, 123 F. 2d 271 (2d Cir. 1941) and Twitchell v. United States, 313 F. 2d 425 (9th Cir. 1963), vacated and remanded sub nom. Rogers v. United States, 376 U.S. 188, 84 S. Ct. 637, 11 L.Ed.2d 603 (1964) (vacated for reconsideration on substantive counts only). These cases distinguish between cases where it is held that a peripheral conspirator, having no knowledge of the operations of the conspiracy as a whole,…
• United States v. LeFAIVRE, 507 F.2d 1288 (4th Cir. 1974)
  …ct a defendant would increase the further the defendant was from the actual use of the facilities in interstate commerce. See also Twitchell v. United States, 313 F. 2d 425, 429 (9th Cir. 1963), vacated and remanded sub nom. Rogers v. United States, 376 U.S. 188, 84 S.Ct. 637, 11 L.Ed.2d 603 (1964). Appellants Miller and Eckert have paraphrased that argument to say that since they were “peripheral figures” in the gambling scheme insofar as the handling of money was concerned, the jury should have been req…
• United States v. Salsbury, 430 F.2d 1045 (4th Cir. 1970)
  …s, that he agreed to a scheme in which the likelihood of cashing an interstate check was known to be great. He relies primarily on Twitchell v. United States, 313 F. 2d 425, 429 (9th Cir. 1963), vacated and remanded sub nom. Rogers v. United States, 376 U.S. 188, 84 S.Ct. 637, 11 L.Ed.2d 603 (1964), where the court, referring to a sheriff who was charged with conspiracy to violate the Mann Act by receiving protection money, said the evidence must show either: “1. he directly agreed to the illegal interstat…