EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF TAMPA

v.

HOSPITAL AND WELFARE BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH

Citator

Cited By

• Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Shelburne, 576 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …oreseeability and duty, and there is a presumption of correctness in its ruling which appellants have not overcome. Exchange Nat’l Bank of Tampa v. Hospital and Welfare Board of Hillsborough County, 181 So. 2d 9, 11 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965), cert. denied, 188 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1966). A rule limiting the admissibility of evidence on the issue of foreseeability to testimony concerning prior similar acts has been rejected by the supreme court. In Stevens v. Jefferson, 436 So. 2d 33, 35 (Fla.1983), the court held that p…
• Lefferts L. Mabie, Jr. v. Garden St. Mgmt. Corp., 397 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 1981)
  …nez v. Martinez, 153 Fla. 753, 15 So. 2d 842 (1943). The First District Court of Appeal, finding that a later rule change overruled Martinez, held that the suit filed first prevails. Hunt v. Ganaway, 180 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), cert. denied, 188 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1966).3 Although there is a rational basis for reaching that conclusion,4 we find that the better policy is to follow Martinez and have the date of service of process govern the jurisdictional conflict presented by this case. We reaffirm Martin…
• Nesbitt v. Cmty. Health OF S. Dade, Inc., 467 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …nd admissible under section 90.803, Florida Statutes (1983). See Exchange National Bank of Tampa v. Hospital & Welfare Board of Hillsborough County, 181 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965) (construing Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act), cert. denied, 188 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1966). In the face of a general and nonspecific objection, the trial court properly overruled. See Caldwell v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, 73 Fla. 1165, 1174, 75 So. 848, 852 (1917). Even if the hospital records in this case were improperly admitt…

Authorities Cited

• The Exch. Nat'l Bank OF Tampa v. Hosp. & Welf. Bd. OF Hillsborough Cnty., 181 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)