DEAN E. PETERS, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN JOSEPH CONNER, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1966-07-20
No. 6647
188 So. 2d 592 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ruiter v. State, 205 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
    …ourt could not increase the sentence originally imposed. The motion was denied, and the appeal which followed was quashed by this court on the ground that the questions raised were manifestly without substantial merit. Ruiter v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188 So. 2d 592 (mem.). Appellant later filed his second Rule 1 motion, the denial of which led to this appeal. One of the grounds urged in support thereof, and now urged here, is the same ground which was the basis of appellant’s first motion and appeal. It has a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw