LOCAL NO. 201, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES (AFL-CIO), ET AL.

v.

CITY OF MUSKEGON

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Fedorenko v. United States, 449 U.S. 490 (U.S. 1981)
  …ing disqualification, and proving those facts by clear and convincing evidence. Ibid. The Court of Appeals noted that its formulation of the second Chaunt test was adopted by the Second Circuit in United States v. Oddo, 314 F. 2d 115, cert. denied, 375 U. S. 833 (1963). Because it ruled in favor of the Government under the second Chaunt test, the Court of Appeals had no reason to consider the Government’s claim that, contrary to the District Court’s findings, the evidence at trial clearly and convincingly…
• Plastic Container Corp. v. Cont'l Plastics OF Okla., Inc., 607 F.2d 885 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …ot know of it or if he does not appreciate that it is the best method.” Benger Laboratories, Ltd. v. R. K. Laros Co., 209 F.Supp. 639, 644, 135 U.S.P.Q. 11, 15 (E.D.Pa.1962), aff’d per curiam, 317 F. 2d 455, 137 U.S.P.Q. 693 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 833, 84 S.Ct. 69, 11 L.Ed.2d 64, 139 U.S.P.Q. 566 (1963). In the previous litigation, the district court concluded that the best mode of carrying out the invention claimed in the Hall Patent was not set forth because the “inventor Hall knew, at the tim…
• United States v. Feodor Fedorenko, 597 F.2d 946 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …t, a fact suppressed or misstated is not material unless the truth would have justified denial of citizenship. The government responds by asserting that the better analysis is found in United States v. Oddo, 2 Cir. 1963, 314 F. 2d 115, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 833, 84 S.Ct. 50, 11 L.Ed.2d 63. In that case, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that a fact suppressed or misstated that would not, in and of itself, have warranted denial of citizenship is material nonetheless if its disclosure would ha…