CAUER ET AL.

v.

JUSTICES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 377 U.S. 271 (U.S. 1964)
  …stituted this civil suit and prayed for divestiture. The District Court, after a trial, held that there was no violation and dismissed the complaint. 214 F. Supp. 501. The case is here on appeal, 15 U. S. C. § 29; and we noted probable jurisdiction. 375 U. S. 808. I. The initial question concerns the identification of the “line of commerce,” as the term is used in § 7. Aluminum wire and cable (aluminum conductor) is a composite of bare aluminum wire and cable (bare aluminum conductor) and insulated or cov…
• United States v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1964)
  …probable jurisdiction to resolve another of the recurring conflicts between the power of the State to tax persons doing business within its borders and the immunity of the Federal Government, its instru-mentalities and property from state taxation. 375 U. S. 808. We affirm. [*44] The Constitution immunizes the United States and its property from taxation by the States, M‘Culloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, but it does not forbid a tax whose legal incidence is upon a contractor doing business with the United…