CEPERO

v.

UNITED STATES CONGRESS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Massachusetts v. Laird, 400 U.S. 886 (U.S. 1970)
  …C. § 333 by alerting and stationing military personnel in the Birmingham area. Such purely preparatory measures and their alleged adverse general effects upon the plaintiffs afford no basis for the granting of any relief.” Alabama v. United States, 373 U. S. 545. In South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U. S. 301, Melton, was further weakened. In that case we denied-standi^ g to South Carolina to assert, claims under the Bill oi Attainder Claúse of Art. I and. the principle of separation of powers which were r…
• Lannom Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 799 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  …2d 869 (1967), and Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F. 2d 608 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied sub nom. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, 384 U.S. 941, 86 S.Ct. 1462, 10 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). In these cases the courts required the Federal Power Commission to develop the facts concerning, and give full consideration to, such issues as the environmental and developmental impact of the proposed power generators, because the Federal…