GONZALEZ ET AL.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO
GONZALEZ ET AL.
CITY OF CHICAGO
373 U.S. 542
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is grantéd and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Green St. Ass'n v. Daley, 373 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1967)…urpose or use, the motives that underlie the exercise of that power may not be questioned. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Town of Sebring, 12 F. 2d 679 (5th Cir. 1926); City of Chicago v. R. Zwick Co., 27 Ill.2d 128, 188 N.E. 2d 489, appeal dismissed, 373 U.S. 542, 83 S. Ct. 1538, 10 L.Ed.2d 687 (1963). Although the actual purpose for which land is condemned may be investigated, the subjective reasons of the legislative authority seeking the acquisition is an “inappropriate area for judicial inquiry.” Deerfie…
-
Gov't OF Guam v. Moylan, 407 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1969)…99 L.Ed. 27 (1954); Cf. Cannata et al. v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 210, 227 N.Y.S.2d 903, 182 N.E. 2d 395, appeal dismissed, 371 U.S. 4, 83 S.Ct. 28, 9 L.Ed.2d 48; City of Chicago v. R. Zwick Co., 27 Ill.2d 128, 188 N.E. 2d 489, appeal dismissed, 373 U.S. 542, 83 S.Ct. 1538, 10 L.Ed.2d 687; State ex rel. Allerton Parking Corp. v. City of Cleveland, 4 Ohio App.2d 57, 211 N.E. 2d 203; Belovsky v. Redevelopment Authority, 357 Pa. 329, 54 A. 2d 277; Atwood v. Willacy County Navigation District, Tex., 271 S.W…