ILLINOIS ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1963-05-20
No. 937
373 U.S. 378 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1970)
    …age value of the property sought to be acquired.” See, e. g., Rutland R. Corp. Abandonment, 317 I. C. C. 393, 425; Chicago N. S. & M. R. Abandonment, 317 I. C. C. 191, 200, aff’d sub nom. Illinois v. United States, 213 F. Supp. 83, aff’d per curiam, 373 U. S. 378; Fort Dodge, D. M. & S. R. Co. Abandonment, 312 I. C. C. 708, 712; Chicago A. & E. R. Corp. Abandonment, 312 I. C. C. 533, 537; Arkansas & O. R. Corp. Abandonment, 312 I. C. C. 501, 505. In its Fourth Supplemental Report the Commission provided for…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw