ATKINSON
v.
TINSLEY, WARDEN
ATKINSON
TINSLEY, WARDEN
372 U.S. 969
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Byers, 740 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Cir. 1984)…United States, 295 F. 2d 897, 902 (8th Cir.1961); United States v. Bacall, 443 F. 2d 1050, 1063 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004, 92 S.Ct. 565, 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Gilbert v. United States, 307 F. 2d 322, 325 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 969, 83 S.Ct. 1095, 10 L.Ed.2d 132 (1963). . Just as courts will utilize plain error only to prevent a “miscarriage of justice,” see text supra at note 51, so will they excuse procedural lapses under the supervening-decision doctrine only as required b…