BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN

v.

VIRGINIA EX REL. VIRGINIA STATE BAR

Citator

Cited By

• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1964)
  …ed that in combination they had that effect. We granted certiorari because the issues involved bear importantly on the conduct of the country’s foreign relations and more particularly on the proper role of the Judicial Branch in this sensitive area. 372 U. S. 905. For reasons to follow we decide that the judgment below must be reversed. Subsequent to the decision of the Court of Appeals, the C. A. Y. receivership was terminated by the State Supreme Court; the funds in question were placed in escrow, pendin…
• Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Va. Ex rel. Va. State Bar, 377 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1964)
  …hood’s rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantee freedom of speech, petition and assembly. We granted certiorari to consider this constitutional question in the light of our recent decision in NAACP v. Button, 371 U. S. 415.2 372 U. S. 905. The Brotherhood’s plan is not a new one. Its roots go back to 1883, when the Brotherhood was founded as a fraternal and mutual benefit society to promote the welfare of the trainmen and “to protect their families by the exercise of benevolence, ve…
• Tilton v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 376 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1964)
  …ervice Act and the applicable collective bargaining agreement. The District Court3 held that petitioners were not entitled to the relief they sought. The Court of Appeals [*172] for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. 306 F. 2d 870. We granted certiorari, 372 U. S. 905, because of the importance of the question in administering the statute protecting veterans’ reemployment rights. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals. The facts are not in dispute. Petitioners were initial…