WILLIAMS
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
WILLIAMS
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
372 U.S. 713
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 L. Ed. 2d 127 · 83 S. Ct. 1021 · SCDB 1962-086 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1818
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DELTA Eng'g Corp. & the Travelers Ins. Co. v. Scott, 322 F.2d 11 (5th Cir. 1963)…Co. v. Meier & Oelhaf Co., 2 Cir., 1958, 262 F. 2d 310, 1959 AMC 1974, and Italia Societa Per Azioni di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co., 9 Cir., 1962, 310 F. 2d 481, 1963 AMC 79, certiorari granted and now pending, 372 U.S. 963, 83 S.Ct. 1094, 10 L.Ed.2d 127. As each of these two opinions reveal, the problem there dealt with arose from the Ryan concept of “the warranty of workmanlike service.” The question posed, then, was: in a relationship giving rise to the Ryan warranty of workmanlike service, does…
Authorities Cited
- Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (U.S. 1963)