HARSHMAN
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1963-04-01
No. 515
372 U.S. 607 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Laurence Adrian Wingerter, Jr., 423 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1970)
    …1164, 22 L.Ed.2d 297; Nelloms v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 399 F. 2d 295, 296; United States v. Taylor, 6 Cir., 1965, 351 F. 2d 228, 230. . Cf. Parker v. United States, 372 U.S. 608, 83 S.Ct. 955, 10 L.Ed.2d 10 (1963); Harshman v. United States, 372 U.S. 607, 83 S.Ct. 955, 10 L.Ed.2d 10 (1963); Kessler v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F. 2d 151, 155. . See also Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375, 381, 75 S.Ct. 392, 395 (1955); Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407, 412-413, 75 S.Ct. 409, 412, 9…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw