UNITED STATES

v.

CARLO BIANCHI & CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., Inc., 373 U.S. 709 (U.S. 1963)
  …ct was in.accord with our conclusion, and we adhere to that conclusion in this case.” Ibid. After receiving additional evidence on damages, the court entered judgment for respondent in the amount of $149,617.36. 157 Ct. Cl.-. We granted certiorari, 371 U. S. 939, to resolve a conflict among the lower courts 3 on the important question of the kind of judicial proceeding to be afforded in eases governed by the Wunderlich Act. [*713] I. The jurisdiction of the Court of Claims in the present case is conferred…
• Local 100 v. Borden, 373 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1963)
  …actual dámages, thus awarding total damages of $3,832. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, 355 S. W. 2d 729, again rejecting petitioner’s preemption argument. Following denial of a writ of error by the Supreme Court of Texas, we granted certiorari, 371 U. S. 939, to consider the question whether federal labor law precludes the exercise of state jurisdiction over this dispute. II. This Court held in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236, that in the absence of an overriding state inter…
• J. S. & H. Constr. Co. v. Richmond Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 473 F.2d 212 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …ed. . The stay order is appealable under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(a) (1) as an order equivalent to an injunction. In Jackson Brewing Company v. Clarke, 5th Cir. 1962, 303 F. 2d 844, 845, cert. denied 371 U.S. 891, 53 S.Ct. 190, 9 L.Ed.2d 124, reh. denied 371 U.S. 939, 83 S.Ct. 305, 9 L.Ed.2d 272, this court stated the applicable rule: An order staying or refusing to stay proceedings in the District Court is appeal-able under § 1292(a) (1) only if (A) the action in which the order was made is an action which, be…