CREEK NATION

v.

UNITED STATES; KELLY V. UNITED STATES; WILLIAMS V. HOT SHOPPES, INC.; N. V. HANDELSBUREAU LA MOLA V. KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL; WILBURN BOAT CO. ET AL. V. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO.; GRIECO V. UNITED STATES, ART NATIONAL MANUFACTURERS DISTRIBUTING CO. ET AL. V. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; FUNKHOUSER V. UNITED STATES; ATKINSON ET AL. V. CITY OF DALLAS

Citator

Cited By

• Zdanok v. The Glidden Co., 327 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …of the Court of Claims, 368 U.S. 814, 82 S.Ct. [*947] 56, 7 L.Ed.2d 22 (1961), affirmed on that issue, 370 U.S. 530, 82 S.Ct. 1459, 8 L.Ed.2d 671 (1962), petition for rehearing (ineluding rehearing of the denial of eertiorari on the merits) denied, 371 U.S. 854, 83 S.Ct. 14, 9 L.Ed.2d 93 (1962), opinion here under appeal, 216 F.Supp. 476 (S.D.N.Y.1963). Some of the literature provoked by our decision in 288 F. 2d 99 is catalogued in footnote 11. . Plaintiffs sought to lessen the force of this by bringing…
• Singleton v. Jackson Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 425 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1970)
  ….2d 672 (1958). . See e. g. National Bank of Genesee v. Whitney, 103 U.S. 99, 26 L.Ed. 443 (1880); Peralta v. United States, 70 U.S. (3 Wall.) 434, 18 L.Ed. 221 (1865). . Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530, 82 S.Ct. 1459, 8 L.Ed.2d 671, reh. den. 371 U.S. 854, 83 S.Ct. 14, 9 L.Ed.2d 93 (1962); Douglas, Stare Decisis, 49 Col. L.Kev. 735. . In fact in McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Railway Co., 235 U.S. 151, 35 S.Ct. 69, 59 L.Ed. 169 (1914), the Supreme Court expressly ruled that the meaning of the Fourtee…
• BAR L Ranch, Inc. v. Phinney, 426 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …asured by the value of the property “received” (the note and accounts in the instant case). Despite the language of the statute, however, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Davis, 1962, 370 U.S. 65, 82 S.Ct. 1190, 8 L.Ed.2d 335, reh. denied, 371 U.S. 854, 83 S.Ct. 14, 9 L.Ed.2d 92, that when a husband transferred stock to his ex-wife pursuant to a property settlement agreement in exchange for relinquishment by her of her marital rights, the husband realized a taxable gain that could be computed. Al…