PIERCE FORD SALES, INC., ET AL.

v.

FORD MOTOR CO.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …., Inc. v. Texaco Co., 240 F. 2d 457 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 965, 77 S.Ct. 1049, 16 L.Ed.2d 914 (1957). We adopted the analysis of Enterprise in Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co., 301 F. 2d 830, 833-34 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829, 83 S.Ct. 40, 9 L.Ed.2d 67 (1962). We agree with the district court that the amount of the illegal discrimination can only be used to quantify damages if the plaintiff demonstrates that the favored purchasers lowered their prices in an amount equiv…
• United States v. Ralph "Whitey" Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …04 (1928); cf., Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443, 465, 41 S.Ct. 172, 65 L.Ed. 349 (1921); Small v. United States, 333 F. 2d 702 (3d Cir. 1964); Pierce. Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 299 F. 2d 425 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829, 83 S, Ct. 24, 9 L.Ed.2d 66 (1962)). Caron’s right to solicit accounts in Milford, Connecticut constituted property within the Hobbs Act definition. The second challenge to the application of the Hobbs Act is equally without merit. The phraseolog…
• Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …is privilege further extends to the degree of control over the dealer’s sale price necessary to' ensure that the new dealer starts off financially sound. Accord, Pierce Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 299 F. 2d 425, 429 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 829, 83 S.Ct. 24, 9 L.Ed.2d 66 (1962); Martin v. Texaco, Inc., 304 F.Supp. 498, 502-504 (S.D.Miss. 1969). On retrial, the jury must decide whether Falstaff restrained the sale price which Kestenbaum could receive, and, if so, whether such restraint was…