DREDGE CORPORATION

v.

HUSITE COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Banzhaf v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 405 F.2d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …the Act does not restrict the Commission merely to supervision of the traffic. It puts -upon the Commission the burden of determining the composition of that traffic. See also, e.g., Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 247, 302 F. 2d 191, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821, 83 S.Ct. 37, 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962); Allen B. Dumont Laboratories v. Carroll, 184 F. 2d 153, 156 (3 Cir. 1950); Bay State Beacon v. FCC, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 216, 171 F. 2d 826 (1948). See generally Note, “Regulation of Program Content by the FCC,” 77 Harv…
• Action FOR Children's Television v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 564 F.2d 458 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …sting Co. v. FCC, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 236, 230 F. 2d 204, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1007, 76 S.Ct. 650, 100 L.Ed. 869 (1956) (award to a competing applicant on basis of superior programming); Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 257, 302 F. 2d 191, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821, 83 S.Ct. 37, 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962) (sole applicant rejected for inadequacy of proposed programming); cf. 47 U.S.C. § 303(m) (1970) (suspension); id. § 312(a) (Supp. V 1975) (revocation). . The “substantial evidence” test of § 706(2)(E) of the APA, 5…
• Citizens Comm. TO Save Wefm & Citizens Comm. to Save Wefm, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 506 F.2d 246 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …utional order. . See Primer on Ascertainment of Community Problems by Broadcast Applicants, 36 Fed.Reg. 4092 (F.C.C.1971); Suburban Broadcasters, 30 F.C.C. 1021 (1961), aff’d sub nom., Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 247, 302 F. 2d 191, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821, 83 S.Ct. 37, 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962) (Bazelon, C. J.). This requirement can be administered in a manner which suggests actual programming control, see Lee Roy McCourry, 2 P & F Radio Reg.2d 895 (1964), discussed Robinson, supra note 27, at 115, 123-1…