READEY ET AL.
v.
ST. LOUIS COUNTY WATER CO. ET AL.

U.S. | 1962-10-08
No. 105
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
371 U.S. 8 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Crawford v. The City OF Detroit, 389 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1968)
    …the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, as amended December 12, 1967,1 it being manifest that no substantial federal question is presented. See Readey v. St. Louis County Water Co., 352 S.W. 2d 622 (Mo.1961), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 371 U.S. 8, 83 S.Ct. 20, 9 L.Ed.2d 47 (1962); Kraus v. City of Cleveland, 163 Ohio St. 559, 127 N.E. 2d 609 (1955), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 351 U.S. 935, 76 S.Ct. 833, 100 L.Ed. 1463 (1956); Chapman v. City of Shreveport, 2…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw