ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
371 U.S. 6
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State OF NEW York v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 600 F.2d 349 (2d Cir. 1979)…(1930). Put another way, “[s]ection 3(4) requires equality of treatment between connecting lines but equality of treatment involves comparable conditions . . . Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. United States, 205 F.Supp. 360, 365 (M.D.Ga.), aff’d, 371 U.S. 6, 83 S.Ct. 42, 9 L.Ed.2d 49 (1962) (per curiam). With respect to lake traffic, the yardstick for measuring discrimination is “the compensation received by the outbound rail carrier on ex-rail traffic from the same port to the same destination.” Arrow…