RAGAN
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL.
RAGAN
CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL.
371 U.S. 3
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Idaho Ass'n OF Naturopathic Physicians, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug Admin., 582 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1978)…Dantzler v. Callison, 352 U.S. 939, 77 S.Ct. 263, 1 L.Ed.2d 235 (1956), and Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114, 9 S.Ct. 231, 32 L.Ed. 623 (1889). In State v. Errington, 355 S.W. 2d 952, appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 371 U.S. 3, 83 S.Ct. 27, 9 L.Ed.2d 48 (1962), the Supreme Court of Missouri relied on Hitchcock v. Gollenberg, 140 F.Supp. 894 (D.Md.1956), and the summary affirmance of that case by the Supreme Court in upholding the conviction of a self-proclaimed naturopath…