KOACHES
v.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; WATTS V. CASTLE, CIRCUIT JUDGE; WATSON V. HOOPER, JUDGE; WEBB V. COMPTON, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO; AND BARKER V. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
KOACHES
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; WATTS V. CASTLE, CIRCUIT JUDGE; WATSON V. HOOPER, JUDGE; WEBB V. COMPTON, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO; AND BARKER V. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
370 U.S. 933
Supreme Court of the United States (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (U.S. 1963)…s. The Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed the Superior Court with respect to appellants’ first prayer but reversed the grant of injunctive relief. -R. I.-, 176 A. 2d 393 (1961).2 Appellants brought this appeal and we noted probable jurisdiction, 370 U. S. 933.3 Appellants are four New York publishers of paperback books which have for sometime been widely distributed in Rhode Island. Max Silverstein & Sons is the exclusive wholesale distributor of appellants’ publications throughout most of the State. Th…
-
Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1963)…rijuana. She was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for “not less than ten nor more than eleven years.” The judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal by the Illinois Supreme Court. 21 Ill. 2d 63, 171 N. E. 2d 17. We granted cer-tiorari. 370 U. S. 933. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we hold that the petitioner’s trial did not meet the demands of due process of law, and we accordingly set aside the judgment before us. On January 17, 1959, three Chicago police officers arrested James Zeno…
-
NEW Jersey v. New York, 372 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1963)…nated in accordance with 28 U. S. C. §§ 2321-2325 and 2284. The court, one judge dissenting, set aside the Commission’s order. 200 F. Supp. 860. New Jersey appealed directly to this Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 370 U. S. 933. The question presented is whether the procedure for discontinuing trains set forth in § 13a (1) of the Interstate Commerce Act is available to the appellee railroad as the court below held, or whether it must follow that set forth in § 13a (2) of…