SCHOLLE

v.

HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.; LONG V. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.; HOLLIS V. TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. ONE 1977 Lincoln Mark V. Coupe, 643 F.2d 154 (3d Cir. 1981)
  …such to seizure without warrant and over the possessor’s objection. Brinegar v. United States, supra, Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 149, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Armada v. United States, 5th Cir., 1963, 319 F. 2d 793; cert. denied 370 U.S. 906, 84 S.Ct. 659, 11 L.Ed.2d 605. Troiano, supra, at 418. The only requirement for a seizure in a forfeiture action is probable cause. Id. Accordingly, the (b)(4) exception allowing a warrantless seizure where supported by probable cause does not offe…
• United States v. Troiano, 365 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1966)
  …such to seizure without warrant and over the possessor’s objection. Brinegar v. United States, supra; Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 149, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; Armada v. United States, 5th Cir., 1963, 319 F. 2d 793; cert, denied 370 U.S. 906, 84 S.Ct. 659, 11 L.Ed.2d 605. For by statute “[a]ny * * * counterfeit * * * obligation * * * of the United States” is declared a “contraband article”. 49 U.S.C. § 781(b) (3). And stamps are “obligations of the United States” within the meaning of…