GILLIAM
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1962-06-25
No. 1274
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
370 U.S. 727 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the ease is remanded to the Coürt of Appeals for further proceedings. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cruz v. Hauck, 404 U.S. 59 (U.S. 1971)
    …ersed lower courts’ holdings that only frivolous claims were sought to be presented. Rubio v. United States, 387 U. S. 90 (1967); Robinson v. United States, 372 U. S. 527 (1963); Jones v. United States, 371 U. S. 25 (1962); Gilliam v. United States, 370 U. S. 727 (1962); Garrett v. United States, 369 U. S. 662 (1962); Kemp v. United States, 369 U. S. 661 (1962); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438 (1962); see 14 cases prior to Coppedge cited id., at 440-441, n. 1. See also Roberts v. LaVallee, 389 U. S…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw