FIRESTONE

v.

ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA ET AL.; AND ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA ET AL. V. SPERRY PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. McPARTLIN, 595 F.2d 1321 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …scribing recent robbery); Magnus Petroleum Co. v. Skelly Oil Co., 446 F.Supp. 874 (E.D.Wis. 1978) (corporate officer’s personal notes of business negotiations); Aluminum Co. v. Sperry Products, Inc., 285 F. 2d 911, 916 (6th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 890, 82 S.Ct. 139, 7 L.Ed.2d 87 (1961) (inventor’s diary of progress on invention). Moreover, the business record exception has been applied to admit documents indistinguishable in kind from Benton’s desk calendars. In United States v. Evans, 572 F. 2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Monroe Auto Equip. Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Supply Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …. v. Murray Corp. of America, supra, 318 F. 2d at 81; Firestone v. Aluminum Co. of America, 285 F. 2d 928, 930 (C.A. 6); Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc., 285 F. 2d 911, 917 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, Firestone v. Aluminum Co. of Amer., 368 U.S. 890, 82 S.Ct. 139, 7 L.Ed.2d 87. From this it may be said that invention is synonymous with unobviousness. Thus to say that a device lacks invention and that it is obvious is to state the same legal proposition in two ways. Application of Jacoby, 309 F…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• The ARO Corp. v. Allied Witan Co., 531 F.2d 1368 (6th Cir. 1976)
  …Lakes Engineering Works, 340 F. 2d 727 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 812, 86 S.Ct. 28, 15 L.Ed.2d 60; Walter v. U. S., 295 F. 2d 720 (6th Cir. 1961); Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc., 285 F. 2d 911 (6th Cir. 1960), cert. den. 368 U.S. 890, 82 S.Ct. 139, 7 L.Ed.2d 87. . In a letter to the district court, Allied’s counsel stated a willingness to attend a hearing but stated, “However" (emphasis in letter), that Aro’s “mere request” for an oral hearing on its motion was insufficient sup…