POST
v.
BOLES, WARDEN

U.S. | 1961-12-04
No. 319
368 U.S. 144 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a hearing in the light of Uveges v. Pennsylvania, 335 U. S. 437, and Herman v. Claudy, 350 U. S. 116.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Burton Junior Post v. Otto C. Boles, 332 F.2d 738 (4th Cir. 1964)
    …should carry the same burden of proving nonwaiver as is required of a defendant in a federal case.” 355 U.S. 155, 161, 78 S.Ct. 191, 195. Other points presented have been considered and we find them to be without merit. Affirmed. . Post v. Boles, 368 U.S. 144, S2 S.Ct. 247, 7 L.Ed.2d 188 (1961). . State ex rel. Post v. Boles, 147 W.Va. -, 124 S.E. 2d 697 (1962). . Post v. Boles, 371 U.S. 833, 83 S.Ct. 57, 9 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962). . 218 F.Supp. 658 (1963). . Post v. Boles, 218 F.Supp. 658, 661. . As to p…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw