DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
368 U.S. 30
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment of the District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in the light of developments which have occurred since the injunction was issued, without prejudice to consideration by that court of any application by appellees for such temporary equitable relief as they may request pending the further proceedings hereby ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rosewell v. Lasalle Nat'l Bank, 450 U.S. 503 (U.S. 1981)…terest in order to defeat federal jurisdiction. United States v. Livingston, 179 F. Supp. 9, 15 (EDSC) (three-judge court), aff’d per curiam, 364 U. S. 281 (1960); United States v. Department of Revenue, 191 F. Supp. 723, 726-727 (ND Ill.), vacated, 368 U. S. 30 (1961).21 [*542] It is not necessary in this case, however, to decide whether the failure to pay interest alone would render a state remedy inadequate.22 Few remedies fully compensate the victim of official wrongdoing, but surely one would not chara…
-
28 E. Jackson Enters., Inc. v. Cullerton, 523 F.2d 439 (7th Cir. 1975)…l.2d 415, 422-23, 167 N.E. 2d 236, 240-41 (1960). Plaintiff has argued that this renders the statutory remedy inadequate. See United States v. Department of Revenue of State of Ill., 191 F.Supp. 723, 726-27 (N.D.Ill. 1961), vacated on other grounds, 368 U.S. 30, 82 S.Ct. 146, 7 L.Ed.2d 90. Since this remedy is not otherwise viable in this case, we express no opinion on this point.…
-
LaSALLE Nat'l Bank under Tr. No. 44891 v. Rosewell, 604 F.2d 530 (7th Cir. 1979)…udge court) (citations omitted) aff’d per curiam, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960). See also, Mullaney v. Hess, 189 F. 2d 417, 420 (9th Cir. 1951); United States v. Department of Revenue, 191 F.Supp. 723, 727 (N.D.Ill.), vacated, 368 U.S. 30, 82 S.Ct. 146, 7 L.Ed.2d 90 (1961).7 And numerous cases prior to the passage of the 1937 Act held that the failure to pay interest on a tax refund constituted an alternative, but independent basis for concluding that the state remedy was inadequate.…