HUBBARD
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NEW YORK CITY
HUBBARD
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NEW YORK CITY
368 U.S. 1
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Avery v. Midland Cnty., 390 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1968)…tly or through subdivisions of the State. “Thus the prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment extend to all action of the State denying [*480] equal protection of the laws; whatever the agency of the State taking the action . . . .” Cooper v. Aaron, 368 U. S. 1, 17 (1958). Although the forms and functions of local government and the relationships among the various units are matters of state concern, it is now beyond question that a State’s political subdivisions must comply with the Fourteenth Amendment.5…
-
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder (D.D.C. 2009)…nce under the Act. But the Act imposes current burdens and must be justified by current needs. The Act also differentiates between the States, despite our historic tradition that all the States enjoy “equal sovereignty.” United States v. Louisiana, 368 U. S. 1, 16 (1960) (citing Lessee of Pollard v. Hagan, 3 How. 212, 223 (1845)); see also Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700, 725-726 (1869). Distinctions can be justified in some cases. “The doctrine of the equality of States ... does not bar ... remedies for loca…