RESOLUTE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
HAYDON BURNS, AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, SUING FOR THE USE OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1966-05-06
No. 6260
ALLEN, C. J., LILES, J., and MAXWELL, OLIVER C., Associate Judge, concur.
186 So. 2d 315 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have determined, from a review of the record and a consideration of the briefs, that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. No facts appear in the record to show abuse of discretion by the judge below.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., LILES, J., and MAXWELL, OLIVER C., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. State, 466 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …ndant to a car break-in; car burglary conviction reversed); Smith v. State, 194 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966) (state’s evidence deemed insufficient to link defendant to a housebreaking; burglary and larceny convictions reversed); Reynolds v. State, 186 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (state’s evidence deemed insufficient to link defendant to the theft of a truck; larceny conviction reversed); Holley v. State, 179 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965) (state’s evidence deemed insufficient to link defendant to a burgla…
  • Harley v. State, 248 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
    …not supported by established principles of law and, therefore, can avail them nothing.2 The judgments appealed are affirmed. WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur. . Reynolds v. State, (Fla.App.1966) 186 So. 2d 315; Daniels v. State, (Fla.1959) 108 So. 2d 755. . Perkins v. State, (Fla.1969) 228 So. 2d 382; Russell v. United States, (1969), 133 U.S.App.D.C. 77, 408 F. 2d 1280.…
  • Redding v. State, 357 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …herein upon the defendant’s motion. Horton v. State, 91 So. 2d 304 (Fla.1956); Smoak v. State, 87 So. 2d 513 (Fla.1956); Wallace v. State, 330 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); J. D. D. v. State, 268 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Reynolds v. State, 186 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). The state argues that the deficiencies in the state’s case were cured by a specific finding of the trial court that the defendant had lied in his testimony when he denied owing any back rent and denied having any conversation wi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw