MOSHEIM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Local 174 v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U.S. 95 (U.S. 1962)
  …ctive bargaining contract, because it was an attempt to coerce the employer to forego his contractual right to discharge an employee for unsatisfactory work.3 We granted certiorari to consider questions of federal labor law which this case presents. 365 U. S. 868. We note at the outset a question as to our jurisdiction. Although the judgment before us has been certified as that of the Supreme Court of Washington, this case was actually heard and decided by Department One of that court, consisting of five of…
• United States v. Mikelberg, 517 F.2d 246 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …conspiracy and for aiding and abetting. See Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1941); Lopez v. Unit ed States, 5 Cir., 1969, 414 F. 2d 909; Mosheim v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 285 F. 2d 949, 952, cert. denied 365 U.S. 868, 81 S.Ct. 903, 5 L.Ed.2d 859; Rodri quez v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 373 F. 2d 17; Surrett v. United States, 5 Cir., 1970, 421 F. 2d 403. As to the conspiracy count, the jury had before it testimony indicating that during the period in question…