MILLER
v.
CALIFORNIA
MILLER
CALIFORNIA
365 U.S. 568
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bova v. State, 392 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…ng the invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege, it is generally agreed that the court possesses broad discretion to deny a request for a mid-interrogation consultation, People v. Miller, 185 Cal.App.2d 59, 8 Cal.Rptr. 91 (1960), appeal dismissed 365 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 807 (1961), or a mid-cross-examination recess. People v. Lewis, supra. However, curtailment of communication during cross-examination does not mean that a defendant is without assistance of counsel while on the witness stan…
-
Marvin Miller aka Marvin James Miller v. E. J. Oberhauser and/or R. W. Wood, 293 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1961)…denied on November 23, 1960. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed; and “treating the papers whereon the appeal * * * as a petition for [a] writ of certiorari, certiorari [was] denied” on March 20, 1961. Miller v. State, 365 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 807. Petitioner petitioned the Supreme Court of California for a writ of habeas corpus on April 10, 1961. This was denied without opinion on April 26, 1961. Although presented to each of seven judges, a panel of this court…