MILLER
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1961-03-20
No. 719
365 U.S. 568 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bova v. State, 392 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
    …ng the invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege, it is generally agreed that the court possesses broad discretion to deny a request for a mid-interrogation consultation, People v. Miller, 185 Cal.App.2d 59, 8 Cal.Rptr. 91 (1960), appeal dismissed 365 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 807 (1961), or a mid-cross-examination recess. People v. Lewis, supra. However, curtailment of communication during cross-examination does not mean that a defendant is without assistance of counsel while on the witness stan…
  • …denied on November 23, 1960. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed; and “treating the papers whereon the appeal * * * as a petition for [a] writ of certiorari, certiorari [was] denied” on March 20, 1961. Miller v. State, 365 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 807. Petitioner petitioned the Supreme Court of California for a writ of habeas corpus on April 10, 1961. This was denied without opinion on April 26, 1961. Although presented to each of seven judges, a panel of this court…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw