CATO
v.
SACKS, WARDEN

U.S. | 1960-06-06
No. 890
363 U.S. 809 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bhd. OF R.R. Carmen OF Am. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 354 F.2d 786 (8th Cir. 1965)
    …y the courts.” Accord: Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson, 1962, 370 U.S. 195, 199-203, 82 S.Ct. 1328, 8 L.Ed.2d 440; Marine Cooks & Stewards, AFL v. Panama Steamship Co., Ltd., 1960, 362 U.S. 365, 369, 80 S.Ct. 779, 4 L.Ed.2d 797, rehearing denied, 363 U.S. 809, 80 S.Ct. 1235, 4 L.Ed.2d 1151. In point of fact, the courts have defined the term labor dispute as used in the Norris-LaGuardia Aet very broadly. See, e.g., Marine Cooks & Stewards, AEL v. Panama Steamship Co., Ltd., supra (picketing by American se…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw