UNITED STATES EX REL. ESCALONA

v.

LAVALLEE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Anderson, 481 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1973)
  …ing, is admissible, and this is true whether the defendant elects to testify in his own defense or not, Orth v. United States (4th Cir. 1918) 252 F. 569, 570; Edmonds v. United States (1959) 106 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 273 F. 2d 108, 112-113, cert. denied 362 U.S. 977, 80 S.Ct. 1062, 4 L.Ed.2d 1012; London v. Patterson (9th Cir. 1972) 463 F. 2d 95, 97; Hale v. United States (10th Cir. 1969) 406 F. 2d 476, 478-479, cert. denied 395 U.S. 977, 89 S.Ct. 2129, 23 L.Ed.2d 765 and whether he appeared as a defendant or w…
• Haynes v. The United States, 418 F.2d 1380 (Ct. Cl. 1969)
  …by plaintiff, we conclude that the administrative decision in regard to the first charge was proper and adequately supported. See Powers v. United States, 169 Ct.Cl. 626, 631 (1965); Lawyer v. United States, 147 Ct.Cl. 501, 504 (1959), cert, denied 362 U.S. 977, 80 S.Ct. 1065, 4 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1960). Plaintiff cited the case of Clark v. United States, 162 Ct.Cl. 477 (1963), as support for his argument that mere minor infractions do not form an adequate basis for an adverse action. However, it is important…
• Harrison v. United States, 387 F.2d 203 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …well, supra note 11, 383 U.S. at 121-123, 86 S.Ct. 773; Hedgepeth v. United States, supra note 9, 364 F. 2d at 687. . See supra note 15. . Edmonds v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 375-378, 273 F. 2d 108, 110-113 (en banc 1959), cert. denied 362 U. S. 977, 80 S.Ct. 1062, 4 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1960); Warde v. United States, 81 U.S. App.D.C. 355, 158 F. 2d 651 (1946). Compare Milton v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 394, 110 F. 2d 556 (1940). See also Orth v. United States, 252 F. 569 (4th Cir. 1918); Heller v.…